Define what you can gamble on when hiring.

Rich Sun

Sr Technical Director, Game Studio at Netflix



Several years ago, I was working at a mid-sized game development company and I needed to hire a solid graphic engineer. After a few interviews, I came across a candidate who was smart and had relevant experience in the relevant domains. However, during the interview, I detected that he might prove to be difficult to work with.

Actions taken

I was aware that sometimes people who fulfill these types of specialized roles can have strong personalities, so I decided to hire him anyway. This decision turned out to be a big mistake. He was extremely demanding and became a disruptive influence on the team, at one point even sending me a long list of ultimatums. Moreover, he was not performing as well as expected. Ultimately, we had to let him go.

Lessons learned

I learned that you and your team should, ahead of time, define together what your must-haves and deal-breakers are when it comes to candidate attributes. While sometimes you will be in a situation where you have to take a gamble on somebody, you should never gamble on your must-haves of dealbreakers. Having a great team that works well together was important to us, but I knowingly gambled on this and I shouldn't have done that. However, these pillars can vary a lot, depending on your experiences, company culture, situation and team dynamics. For example, I am personally much more comfortable gambling with on-paper skills and education levels than I am with team fit.

Be notified about next articles from Rich Sun

Rich Sun

Sr Technical Director, Game Studio at Netflix

Connect and Learn with the Best Eng Leaders

We will send you a weekly newsletter with new mentors, circles, peer groups, content, webinars,bounties and free events.


HomeCircles1-on-1 MentorshipBounties

© 2024 Plato. All rights reserved

LoginSign up