Establishing Alignment After Company Acquisition
28 October, 2021

VP of Engineering at Uplight
Problem
At my previous employer, our company went through one of the largest partner acquisitions in telecom history. This growth quadrupled the size of the engineering department and brought many new approaches to the same problems and tasks. There were different tools, opinions and ways of developing features or new products. This slowed down our productivity, our ability to ship code, the quality of our products and increased the incidents in production.
Actions taken
The first action we took was making a program we called "box buddies." Essentially, we paired up employees that originated from different companies and assigned them to become work partners. In doing so, we identified connection points of relationships that should be built both across functions and legacy companies. The individuals in this program learned new skills, techniques, and ways of approaching a problem.
Secondly, we created a new compelling way to develop that absorbed different aspects of how original companies were doing it. We didn't pick one existing way or use one more than another. Instead, we created a brand new method that was opt-in, meaning employees could choose this method or not. By making our method compelling and not forcing it upon our team, our employees were more open to use the new system.
Our third course of action was to alter our vocabulary, specifically the critical leaders in the integration process. We made sure not to talk about original companies anymore. These key leaders would model the suggested behavior of our ideal employee by using this new set of language and not reminiscing about the past of any company. When a problem arose, our team would talk about it and come to a solution without involving how a past company may have worked to solve it. We stopped saying "legacy company A or B," and focused on our new organization rather than the old ones. We tried to open key leaders' minds to the change we were going through and model their vocabulary towards our new goals.
After these changes, we still struggled with some challenges. The above approaches did not solve all of the problems, but it did create a substantial momentum that allowed us to integrate major applications within the first year and continue to grow hiring and create a new unified culture.
Lessons learned
- Change is hard for everybody, no matter what size of company you're at. Speaking openly and vulnerably about that change, not in a technical manner but on a personal level, will help. It made people feel more comfortable talking about the change, which opened them to our new way of doing things.
- When we created new methods for tasks, we had to make sure they were documented and compelling. We had to sell our changes to our employees, showing them why it matters, why it is the best, and why they should try it. Forcing our employees to work in our new way created less adoption. When we made compelling arguments and let our team decide for themselves, they were more onboard.
- It takes time to see progress in the integration process. It is hard to see change daily, and by looking often, you may become discouraged. Be patient and take steps until you see benefits. By using a longer time horizon, your changes will be more apparent.
Discover Plato
Scale your coaching effort for your engineering and product teams
Develop yourself to become a stronger engineering / product leader
Related stories
19 May
Jonathan Belcher, Engineering Manager at Curative, shares an unknown side of synchronous communication tools and advises managers on how to handle a team that’s spread across the globe.

Jonathan Belcher
Engineering Manager - Patient Experience at Curative
16 May
Alexis Philippe, Vice President, Product & Engineering at Amilla, describes his one simple rule for creating a culture of helpfulness that doesn't disrupt productivity.

Alexis Philippe
Vice President, Product & Engineering at Amilla
16 May
Snehal Shaha, Lead Technical Program Manager at Momentive (fka SurveyMonkey), details her short-term technical strategy to unify processes among teams following an acquisition.

Snehal Shaha
Senior EPM/TPM at Apple Inc.
13 May
Tom Hill, Engineering Manager at Globality, Inc., describes his decision-making practices when making architectural decisions.

Tom Hill
Engineering Manager at Torii
11 May
Tom Hill, Engineering Manager at Globality, Inc., shares how he works with a culturally diverse team based within a thirteen-hour time gap.

Tom Hill
Engineering Manager at Torii
You're a great engineer.
Become a great engineering leader.
Plato (platohq.com) is the world's biggest mentorship platform for engineering managers & product managers. We've curated a community of mentors who are the tech industry's best engineering & product leaders from companies like Facebook, Lyft, Slack, Airbnb, Gusto, and more.
